Eu4 ideal army composition.

For a better explanation of composition, and even for combat mechanics in general, check out Reman's Paradox War Acadamy on Youtube. Part 1 is the composition IIRC, and part 2 is Mechanics. Part 3 covers idea groups, but it's not as important.

Eu4 ideal army composition. Things To Know About Eu4 ideal army composition.

The rest of the hordes are quite evenly matched so just play whatever you like. These are my and the EU4 community’s top 3 hordes - Oirat, Jianzhou and Kazan. If this post gets a hundred upvotes I will edit it with a bonus bonus section revealing what I believe to be the best idea group choices for hordes. (Doing it for fun idk).There is no general best army composition, because it depends on many factors. Often cavalry is a better than infantry, but it is much more expensive so it is usually not worth the cost. Likewise artillery helps, because it can shoot from the backrow, but it is even more expansive than cavalry, so it is not worth it for its fighting power in ...Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... I'm playing a relaxed colonial Portugal run, and was wondering what the ideal army size for garrisoning colonies in the Americas is? Same for African colonies? Thanks in advance. This thread is archived ... r/eu4 • Quick and dirty army composition: I/C/A = width/4/width (incl which unit type to pick) ...Jun 26, 2020 · Hills and woodlands are only -1 but these modifiers effect both combat phases so best to avoid. Crossings/Landings - Same as the terrain really. Straits and naval landings give -2, and rivers -1. In the case of multiple attacks from different directions, the worst modifier is used for the whole attacking force.

Thanks for the replies everyone. Can't say I'm certain what composition I'm more comfortable with. I liked the 3/1/2 because of the aforementioned carpet sieging as well as the plentiful number of infantry compared to cavalry; I tend to be quite paranoid about running the risk of having too few infantry to support my cavalry after particularly …But no matter the country, that composition of 16/4/5 is not optimal, you have far too many infantry and too little artillery. In a previous comment on this thread you say that you're in the late game. So the composition you would want is 20/0/20 or 22/0/20 ideally.Posted by u/Iconopony - 1 vote and 1 comment

The ideal army composition is to exceed at least by 4 the enemy's front, have cavalry in your flanks, and later on as much artillery as you can afford. I don't build permanent stacks, but I rather form them before the war, considering the enemy's army/terrain.If memory serves right, in 1650 your combat width should be around 32. So a good army composition might be 32 front row infantry + 8 spare units = 40 infantry and 21 artillery to get the maximum siege bonus on a star fort capital (level 6 + 1). You can go all the way up to 32 artillery, if you can afford that.

I've always wondered which composition of my army would be optimal. Most of the time I used 2:1:1 or 3:1:2, but have never been really certain if this was optimal. You surely know the wiki-charts showing how unit-pips increase for each tech-group and that there are several steps shifting the effectiveness of units from infantry to cavalry and back.If you can't afford or don't have the manpower for an army of that size, then stick to an amount of cannons, at least that many infantry plus more to replace losses (infantry always take the most casualties) and 2-4 cavalry to flank. So say your combat width is fifteen, your ideal army has 15 artillery, 22-23 infantry and 4 cavalry.For example, at tech 32, an ideal army composition before considering monetary costs or supply limits would be: 42-46 infantry, 10 cav (optional), and 40 artillery. Artillery shouldn’t be taking casualties so you don’t need extra regiments. Them’s the basics. Everything is situational when it comes to EU4.This was the case earlier, but it's more important now, and also applies to the backline. I don't know the exact number if reserves, but having 2 or 3 units more than combat width (for each army) should be fine. TL;DR Try combat width / 2, +2. That much frontline and backline. 4 CAV per army is fine, I wouldn't go over that, and I really like CAV.

Ideal army composition in 2023? ... Some franchises and games of note: Stellaris, Europa Universalis, Imperator: Rome, Crusader Kings, Hearts of Iron, Victoria and Cities: Skylines. Members Online. Mockup Political Map of Anataloia from Tinto Talks #4

Hey guys, hope you enjoy this combat guide that will hopefully introduce you to the basics of combat in EU4! As always, this guide is written with some bias,...

Make sure to fight on flat ground. Lacking arty was more impactful than fighting on rough terrain though. It really is that important to have arty. Anyone saying that you should run 100% CAV is implying that your frontline should consist only of CAV, backline still requires arty. Little_Elia.Learn the optimal army composition in Europa Universalis IV and dominate the battlefield. Discover the best troop types, ratios, and tactics that will make your armies unbeatable. Subscribe to Updates Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.Army Composition . I saw the spreadsheet that the weekly thread has up, but of course we all know that a lot of provinces can't support a size 86 army. ... Oh i wouldn't, but i was wondering what's the ideal size to engage? Combat width dictates effective engagement size, but the more you send in the more they suffer morale damage, but also ...Hi y'all, so I'm adenine chunk new to EU4, only have about a hundred hours, and the thing that confuses me the maximum is us composed. How large infantry do I...What would be the most efficient and powerful composition of inf/cav/art. Also how does artillery affect siege? I understand that having just 1 artillery unit gives a +1 to the siege but after that i don't understand how much i need for +2 and beyond.Light Ships are your bread and butter. These are okay in a fight, and you usually build hundreds of them. Send them out in stacks of 10-20 to control and direct trade. Glom them together into a huge fleet in war time, and they'll make up for their individual weakness with sheer volume of fire. Heavy Ships are the kings of naval warfare, but ...

An EU4 Army Composition Guide focusing on the best army composition that europa universalis 4 has to offer. Both a great army composition guide for beginners...Combat width is the maximum amount of units that can participate in one combat "row" at one time. So in your example of 24 combat width you can have 24 units in the front line and 24 units in the back line. The game will automatically fill your frontline with infantry and cavalry and your backline with artillery.Toward the end of my back to the Piast run, I had to grab a polish enclave in the middle of Russian territory. Russia's running around with like, three times my force limit, so i was a bit worried about going to war with them.Concrete is thinner, stronger and more durable than mortar; whereas mortar is used as a bonding agent between building materials, concrete is used for structural projects, such as ...Apr 16, 2024 · Here, a minimum of 4 cavalry units (2 on each side) is required. The dynamic changes for the last time at level 30, where 6 cavalry units will be required for maximize flanking. For example: Early game: 8 infantry, 2 cavalry, 5 artillery. Mid game: 18 infantry, 2 cavalry, 10 artillery. So, without army composition, the AI can't make shit armies, and the newer players can't make terrible armies, loose, and stop the game or just follow mechanically a guide that is bad but failproof. I'm also guilty of playing 2 cav-rest inf-canons up to battle width like the vast majority of players, and I don't switch to 50%cav on cav techs ...2)+0.2 military tactics is huge, it provides a flat modifier to damage taken so you are taking 13.3% more losses from military tactics alone. 3) You have a -1 to all rolls from a terrain penalty. 4) Your leader is 2/1/2/0, Spains is 6/4/1/1 so they are a net 4/3/-1/1 better.

Heavies only is the ideal naval composition. Naval engagement width has a base of 25. It is not increased by tech, unlike army combat width. It is only increased by a couple of policies you'll never use (because they both require Naval idea group), as well as a context based 10% increase in coastal seas.

There is no 'ideal' composition. There are good ones. Start with a general, always make sure you have a general. Make your army big. Bigger armies are less likely to be engaged and less likely to lose. Start with infantry. Up to full combat width or force limit, whichever comes first. When cannons come along get at least 5, 6 is better and 10 ...A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. Members Online Am I the only one annoyed by the fact that level 2 and 3 advisors could cost as much as an entire army's maintenanceFor SP, all the best horde players use infantry only (well, and artillery if available). Horse memes can be fun but that should tell you all you need to know. 1. bronzedisease. • 8 mo. ago. 50/50 is fine. But you might get to a point where Cavs cost less. In that case get more Cavs obviously. Full Cavs is fine too.40K subscribers. 1.2K. 61K views 4 years ago EU4 Basics. Part 3 of a 4 part series on basics of combat and combat related mechanics. In this part, we discuss ideal …At 40 combat width, undisputed optimal army composition is 32-8-40. This is making some assumptions about having a reinforcement stack nearby if you happen to engage an equal size stack. Less than 40 combat width, which means lower miltech and therefore lower supply limits is more disputed.Anyways, enjoy! I made a spreadsheet that calculates the ideal army composition during certain tech levels in EU4. I based this on my own experience, reddit threads about army composition, and threads on other EU4 forums. Link to the spreadsheet. The link is view only but feel free to make a copy under "File" in the top left corner and test it ...This is the correct answer. While horde cav is less inefficient than other cav in terms of power for money, you're still better off using infantry - especially since the hordes usually do not have a great economic situation for most of the game.This option to transfer provinces doesn't seem useful and I thought it was one of the benefits of art of war. Tbh I use province transfer a lot, because u can give your vassal all the shit you don't want to core. But sometimes they won't accept too many in peace screen. If I occupy a load of provinces in a war and I want to give them to my ...Anyways, enjoy! I made a spreadsheet that calculates the ideal army composition during certain tech levels in EU4. I based this on my own experience, reddit threads about army composition, and threads on other EU4 forums. Link to the spreadsheet. The link is view only but feel free to make a copy under "File" in the top left corner and test it ...Ideal Army composition for Russia? I'm playing Extended Timeline, using 50.000-men stacks, on the 2010s.

That guide is pretty good, there's a lazy mans variant though which is slightly more fiddly in battle but less attrition and ideal for splitting for rebel suppression. Start: 18/2/0 (16/4 if your tech / ideas has good cav) Tech 7: 17/2/1 (15/4/1 if good cav, 1 artillery for sieges mostly so can be in a dedicated army)

Quick and dirty army composition: I/C/A = width/4/width (incl which unit type to pick) Tip. TLDR: for the easiest good template: use infantry and cannons equal to your combat width, and add 4 horses. Before tech 16, pick inf and cav with the best offensive shock pips, and arty doesn't matter. After tech 16, pick inf with the best defensive fire ...

Ideally you want cannons on the back row and infantry/cav (Composition depending on the nation you are playing) on the front row. Front fills in first and artillery isn't that useful until later techs. With Brandenburg I would recommend 2-4 cav depending on your income, 22 infantry and only 3 cannons for sieges as at tech 7 it is not worth the ...Active-Cow-8259. • 1 yr. ago. 1.35 doesnt really Change Combat as far as I know. If you dont know much about composition Here is the most important stuff. You should allways try to fill the combat with (cw) in the front row (infrantry + cavalery). The backrow is only used by the artillery, so artillery allways adds extra damage, however ...Cavalry are elite units who do two special roles (and the biggest question mark wrt army composition). First, they can flank and help mop up smaller enemy armies faster. Second, they typically do a bit more morale and shock damage than infantry (though at 2.5 times the cost) giving you an edge against a difficult opponent.They deal a decent amount of damage especially if you're up a tech or 2 and have better pips. I tend to run 20inf Then fill combat width with cav. Have like 5-10 cannons depending on what you can afford just to make sieges less painful plus a little extra damage in fire phases. Hope this helps. 2.Tech 1-16: 4 cavalry and the rest of combat width of infantry. Tech 7: add at least 1 cannon to the fighting stack, to get +1 at siege. You may additionally make 10/0/10 siege stack, not for fighting and just for fast siege of forts level 1-3, since they are the most common. 10 infantry may be replaced with 10-16 infantry mercenaries.Thanks for the replies everyone. Can't say I'm certain what composition I'm more comfortable with. I liked the 3/1/2 because of the aforementioned carpet sieging as well as the plentiful number of infantry compared to cavalry; I tend to be quite paranoid about running the risk of having too few infantry to support my cavalry after particularly heavy battles, and I also often like to construct ...Cavalry gets massive bonus at tech 17 and 23 respectively, which almost universally makes it a tolerable alternative to infantry. At techs 6/7 infantry has 25% higher base damage output, probably closer to 27-30% in practice. Not sure if there's any tech group where pip differences would offset this. 1.Make sure to fight on flat ground. Lacking arty was more impactful than fighting on rough terrain though. It really is that important to have arty. Anyone saying that you should run 100% CAV is implying that your frontline should consist only of CAV, backline still requires arty. Little_Elia.Well, when playing a horde nation there's no support limit for cavalry, so 100% cavalry armies are possible. The nomad tech group also starts you off with relatively strong units. If you mix in some cavalry combat ability and a decent shock general, your armies will steamroll anything you come across. For a century or so.See third last paragraph: -Increases max number of custom nations to 100 (It's hardcoded I cannot change it to be more than this) i just wasn't sure if it might help or not :/. I wanted to create a custom scenerio for something, and after creating 32 custom nations the game just told me I can't create any more CNs. I know….5. sacrich_cc. • 4 yr. ago. As everything with EU it’s pretty complicated, here’s a doc telling you the optimal comp for every tech. 3. BaronWalrus1. • 4 yr. ago. Build a combat width stack with 2 or 4 cavalry depending on your economy give it 3 artillery as well so you can barrage capital forts. The rest of your FL can be saved for ...Leaves the stack strong enough enough to hold out until reinforcements arrive, plus they are very effective on their own. I merge several of those for big fights …

As the game progresses cavalry become more and more obsolete with western factions, hence about 4-6 cavalry and no more is ideal regardless of combat width. Supply limit determines how big an army you can place in a province without taking attrition. In early game (Level 0 - Level 8) when supply limit averages 15-20, I use a 15 man (11/4/0 ...Hello! I've been playing the EU series fairly consistently since the end of EU III's cycle, but I still feel like I don't completely understand the ideal army composition. Currently, I use armies of twenty units: eight infantry, four cavalry, and... Been playing EU4 off and on for a number of years now, and for a while I've been running an army composition of having 4 cavalry for every stack I have (assuming I can afford them, ofc). I picked this up several years ago, don't remember from where/who, but I'm now questioning whether this is still effective. Instagram:https://instagram. miranti awardscomanche crossing frio riverlg french door refrigerator leaking water under deli drawerchrisean friend marsh ig Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by noobuser838. Army compositions . In general, what is the best army composition to deal the most cassualties? This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast comments sorted by ...Yeah, but you use a bunch of loopholes, pretty much landing squarely in the "lo nope, that's not supposed to happen." Long story short, you start as Crimea, conquer west until you eat most of Poland's land and can keep Lithuania under control, then conquer a bunch of land in the HRE until you can culture shift to german and form Westphalia, this changes you to a monarchy without reforming your ... lorex app not workingmidland autozone 328K subscribers in the eu4 community. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by… Advertisement matt's off road recovery rudy The Shanghai Composite Index tracks the biggest and most important public companies in China. The Shanghai Composite Index tracks the biggest and most important public companies in...The question is, which should be the first 2 Military Ideas that Austria chooses? I ended an Austria game with Quantity (first), Defensive (second), Aristocratic (third), and Quality (fourth). I had absolutely amazing generals with the -1% army tradition decay from Aristocratic idea, the +2% army tradition from Defensive and Quality, and the ...